Monday, February 06th, 2012

    You are not currently logged in.

    Username
    Password
     

The Matthew Paradox: Riches and Abundance

Dec 31st, 2008 | By James Dale Davidson | Category: Abundance


The Matthew Paradox: Riches and Abundance

“For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath.”

– Matthew (XXV:29)

One of the more provocative passages in the New Testament is the account of a line spoken by “the Master” in Jesus’ parable of the talents.

People usually understand it to mean that “the rich get richer and the poor get poorer” – a complaint that underlies a good deal of unhappiness about life.

Among the many the examples of seemingly unfair outcomes attributable to the “Matthew Effect” is that children who have a head start in reading comprehension normally get superior results in school and, later on, in their jobs.

Another seemingly unfair outcome is the tendency for more famous scientists who do equivalent work to that done by less well-known researchers get more recognition – including prizes and other financial rewards – for simultaneous discoveries.

In other words, if two scientists both come up with a new theory or discovery at about the same time, most of the credit will go to the one who is already more famous.

Likewise, if a professor adds his name to groundbreaking research by his graduate student, the professor will get the Nobel Prize. The graduate student will get the footnote.

The current financial meltdown highlights this version of Matthew’s verse. With many assets priced at pennies on the dollar, the rich who have cash to buy deeply discounted assets have the opportunity to become richer still.

And those in still their twenties have the full scope to profit from the current depression in the same way the late Sir John Templeton profited.

In 1939, when he was just 27 years old, Templeton calculated that war would kick America out of depression. He ordered his stockbroker to buy $100 worth of all the stocks selling at under $1 a share, including the bankrupt ones. Within four years, his $10,000 investment had become $40,000.

This is a luxury that baby boomers who find themselves wondering how they will support themselves in retirement do not have.

I recall my late father’s habit of reading Matthew in this needy way. He never forgot that he had been forced to reduce his inheritance from his grandmother in the depths of the last depression because he could not afford to pay property taxes on all the land parcels she left him.

In particular, he lamented the loss of a large tract of land near Orlando that later became Disney World.

There is, however, a more complicated and interesting interpretation of the verse from Matthew. This takes the discussion of abundance in an entirely different direction.

I call this the “Abundance Paradox.”

Sir John Templeton was an advocate of this view. He felt that one of the better ways to become rich was to give his money away.

At a certain level, this sounds like rank nonsense. After all, if you give your capital away, you have less of it.

But in the sense captured by the idea of karma, the universe tends to reward those who earn it.

In other words, if you are not on the Forbes list of the world’s billionaires and you resent it, you will take on the attitude of a loser. This will actually prevent you from becoming financial successful.

On the other hand, if you adopt an attitude of abundance, and even give away some portion of your money, Abundance (with a capital “A”) will become real to you.

You will feel like a winner. You will be in the right frame of mind to seize the opportunities that come your way.

If you feel rich, you are more likely to become rich.

This is not an argument for delusion. Abundance does not mean pretending you are rich. It means something else: being a winner rather than a loser.

Abundance means learning to enjoy the deepest and most gratifying expressions of true wealth: family, friends, intellectual passions and your heart’s true desires.

In fact, people who accumulate vast wealth use their leisure to cultivate exactly these things.

As Sir John Templeton said after retiring from money management, “I focus on spiritual wealth now, and I’m busier, more enthusiastic, and more joyful than I have ever been.”

Our objective in Abundance is to pay homage to Templeton’s genius in more ways than one.

We will help you use his brilliant methods for looking around the globe to find undervalued investments that build wealth. But we will also help you look into yourself and cultivate and attitude of Abundance – true wealth you can enjoy whenever you care to let yourself.

If you had to imagine yourself taking up an entirely new life where your wealth was unknown (you can’t take anything with you but your family), your neighbors were new and you filled no known role, where would imagine your happiness to fall on a scale of one to ten?

If you allow yourself be a ten, it will help you cultivate Abundance.

This underscores the “Matthew Paradox” or the “Paradox of Abundance.”

Above a basic threshold, what really determines whether you are one who “hath” or “hath not” is your own attitude.

If you appreciate your blessings and feel you are one who “hath,” you will attract abundance.

Templeton thought that those who earn wealth, as opposed to those who inherit it, tend to share a high level of gratitude. They appreciate their blessings.

If you look at your glass as half empty and imagine yourself as a “hath not,” you will be right. Even that which you have will be taken away.

Simply put, success attracts and failure repels.

Our aim in Abundance is to truly understand this paradox. To help you build your fortune as well as live your life more richly and deeply by realizing your heart’s desires.

Stay tuned. We have many more exciting ideas to explore.

James Davidson

Editor,

Abundance

Special

Cash in on the NEW COLD WAR

The October 13th confirmation of new $5.7 trillion petroleum reserve has thrust the superpowers into an all-or-nothing energy stare-down. Here’s how YOU could parlay their high-stakes chess-game into 190 TIMES YOUR MONEY or more…

For more info, click here.

Crisis Updates

“Synchronized recession”… The real consequences of bailing out Detroit… The next shoe to fall in the real estate sector… The death of the great American consumer… Betting against deflation…

* A UCLA Anderson Forecast report has predicted a deepening of the U.S. recession next year. Here’s a quick rundown of the main points it makes.

  1. The U.S recession will get worse before it gets better
  2. Lower oil prices are dragging down consumer prices in general
  3. Real GDP will shrink by 4.1% this quarter and by another 3.4% and 0.8% in the first and second quarters of next year
  4. The global economy is in a “synchronised recession,” the first since the early 1990s
  5. Employers will shed an additional two million jobs over the next year.
  6. By late 2009, the U.S. unemployment rate will hit 8.5 percent, compared with 6.7 percent in November

** The Bush administration has gone back on its promise not to use TARP funds to ‘rescue’ the U.S auto industry. It will now give GM and Chrysler $17.4 billion – $3.4 billion more than Congress was willing to payout.

This will tip the U.S. economy further towards a prolonged recession for three reasons.

  1. The $14 billion will be only the first of many bailouts. But the U.S. has no savings to pay for these rescue efforts.This means the country will have to go further into debt to foreign creditors via Treasury auctions or print more money via the Fed’s printing presses.Either option will lead to serious consequences for the economy – consequences few are willing to face.Already there is a steep decline in foreigners buying U.S. government debt. This is because at the same time as the Treasury is auctioning off dollar-based securities the Fed is busy devaluing the dollar via the printing press. If this trend continues, we can expect one of two outcomes: higher interest rates or a significantly weaker dollar.The U.S can’t afford higher rates right now. So in the end, Uncle Sam will attempt to attract foreign capital the only way it can: by further devaluing the dollar to make U.S. assets cheaper to foreign buyers.
  2. The auto bailout will create more “zombie” companies like those created by Japan in the 1990s.This will reduce U.S. competitiveness and stymie any genuine economic recovery.
  3. The decision to extend public funds to the auto industry will create a cascade effect of more incompetent American companies looking for government money. This will leave President-elect Obama in a no win situation. If he says no to the bailout of the other companies in trouble, he’ll be seen as playing favourites with the automakers. If he says yes, he will be handing over a blank check to corporate America drawn on the U.S. taxpayer.

** The commercial real estate sector looks like it will be next shoe to fall in the credit crisis.

This from a recent Bloomberg article…

U.S. commercial properties at risk of default could triple if rental income from office, retail and apartment buildings drops by even 5 percent, a likely possibility given the recession, according to research by New York-based real estate analysts at Reis Inc.

The relationship between consumers and businesses is very clear. Businesses shutdown when consumers cut back on spending.

This drop-off in spending is already taking place. The U.S. Commerce Department announced that sales in November dropped 9%, compared to November of last year.

* My prediction of a decade-long Japanese style slump is picking up steam in the mainstream press.

This from Stephanie Pomboy, the founder and president of macroeconomic research firm MacroMavens. Pomboy is one of the few analysts to foresee the current credit collapse.

The economic deleveraging has barely begun … It all revolves around the idea that U.S. consumers are actually going to do the unthinkable - they are going to save - and that we will be more like Japan than anyone believes is possible.

Like me, Pomboy sees a disastrous collapse of consumer spending in the U.S.

Wages have been silently crowded out by benefits as a share of total compensation, as companies look to offset rising health-care costs. The result is that the share of income that consumers can actually spend is at its lowest in the post-war period. It had not been a problem, because consumers would just borrow to fill that gap. But now, they don’t have appreciating assets against which to borrow.

* One of the biggest questions investors need to ask themselves right now is whether we are looking at an inflationary or deflationary future.

Bill and I touched on this in our emergency report. As we put it, “People fear dandruff now more than they fear inflation.”

The market is now betting heavily on a deflationary outcome. Most investors see the reduction in credit leading to a general decline in prices.

You can see this in the spread between January 2010

inflation-protected (TIPS) bond yields and the yield on regular

January 2010 Treasury bond yields.

January TIPS bond are yielding 6.95%. Regular January bonds are yielding 0.39%. The market is pricing in a decline in inflation of 6.56% over the next 12 months.

This represents a great opportunity for contrarian

investors. The market is currently long on deflation. But there are good reasons to believe that inflation, not deflation, will be the outcome of the current crisis in the long run.

Although the current deluge of fiscal stimulus has yet to show up in the money supply (as measured by M2), the government has increased monetary base (the amount of currency in circulation plus commercial banks’ reserves with the Fed) by about $11 billion a day since September. This works out at about 370% on an annualized rate.

The banks are not yet lending this money. So it is not yet feeding into the money supply. But as soon as banks start lending, supply will increase dramatically and lead to price inflation.

That’s because the more dollars there are in circulation, each dollar buys a smaller percentage of a good or service.

In fact, some investors are already beginning to price in inflation. In the past month, the U.S. Dollar Index – a measure of the dollar’s strength against six major currencies – has dropped 10%. During that same timeframe, gold has moved higher by 175 points – a 25% climb.

There are two easy ways to bet against the crowd here. You can buy into gold through an exchange-traded fund (ETF) such as the SPDR Gold Trust ETF

(NYSE:GLD). Or you could look into the MarketVectors Gold Mining ETF

(NYSE:GDX), which tracks gold mining stocks.


nothing in this e-mail should be considered personalized investment advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investment advice.

We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security recommended to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. This Newsletter may only be used pursuant to the subscription agreement and any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Abundance Letter . P.O. Box 925, Frederick, MD 21705 USA